| card | R Documentation |
Wooldridge Source: D. Card (1995), Using Geographic Variation in College Proximity to Estimate the Return to Schooling, in Aspects of Labour Market Behavior: Essays in Honour of John Vanderkamp. Ed. L.N. Christophides, E.K. Grant, and R. Swidinsky, 201-222. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Professor Card kindly provided these data. Data loads lazily.
data('card')
A data.frame with 3010 observations on 34 variables:
id: person identifier
nearc2: =1 if near 2 yr college, 1966
nearc4: =1 if near 4 yr college, 1966
educ: years of schooling, 1976
age: in years
fatheduc: father's schooling
motheduc: mother's schooling
weight: NLS sampling weight, 1976
momdad14: =1 if live with mom, dad at 14
sinmom14: =1 if with single mom at 14
step14: =1 if with step parent at 14
reg661: =1 for region 1, 1966
reg662: =1 for region 2, 1966
reg663: =1 for region 3, 1966
reg664: =1 for region 4, 1966
reg665: =1 for region 5, 1966
reg666: =1 for region 6, 1966
reg667: =1 for region 7, 1966
reg668: =1 for region 8, 1966
reg669: =1 for region 9, 1966
south66: =1 if in south in 1966
black: =1 if black
smsa: =1 in in SMSA, 1976
south: =1 if in south, 1976
smsa66: =1 if in SMSA, 1966
wage: hourly wage in cents, 1976
enroll: =1 if enrolled in school, 1976
KWW: knowledge world of work score
IQ: IQ score
married: =1 if married, 1976
libcrd14: =1 if lib. card in home at 14
exper: age - educ - 6
lwage: log(wage)
expersq: exper^2
Computer Exercise C15.3 is important for analyzing these data. There, it is shown that the instrumental variable, ‘nearc4', is actually correlated with 'IQ', at least for the subset of men for which an IQ score is reported. However, the correlation between 'nearc4“ and 'IQ', once the other explanatory variables are netted out, is arguably zero. At least, it is not statistically different from zero. In other words, 'nearc4' fails the exogeneity requirement in a simple regression model but it passes, at least using the crude test described above, if controls are added to the wage equation. For a more advanced course, a nice extension of Card’s analysis is to allow the return to education to differ by race. A relatively simple extension is to include black education (blackeduc) as an additional explanatory variable; its natural instrument is blacknearc4.
Used in Text: pages 526-527, 547
https://www.cengage.com/cgi-wadsworth/course_products_wp.pl?fid=M20b&product_isbn_issn=9781111531041
str(card)